How are we to avioid the following play of mirrors: a proposition must be true because its expressible is true, while the expressible is true only when the proposition itself is true? All these difficulties stem from a common source: in extracting the double from the proposition we have evoked a simple phantom. Sense so defined is only a vapor which plays at the limit of things and words. Sense appears here as the outcome of the most powerful logical effort, but as Ineffectual, a sterile incorporeal deprived of its generative power. Lewis Carroll gave a marvelous account of all of these paradoxes: that of the neutralizing doubling appears in the form of the smile without a cat, while that of the proliferating redoubling appears in the form of the knight who always gives a new name to the name of the song - and between these two extremes lies all the secondary paradoxes which form Alice’s adventures.
- Gilles Deleuze, Difference & Repetition
87 notes
  1. theanimalnamesofplants reblogged this from adumbrations and added:
    planeofimmanence )
  2. opusaliud reblogged this from adumbrations
  3. adumbrations reblogged this from antimusadeleuze
  4. antimusadeleuze reblogged this from planeofimmanence
  5. planeofimmanence posted this

The Plane of Immanence

The Plane of Immanence

"The plane of immanence is not a concept that is or can be thought but rather the image of thought, the image thought gives itself of what it means to think, to make use of thought, to find one's bearings in thought."-Deleuze

Cody/student/27/American/etc., etc., etc./

Facebook http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=541014768

Skype: CodyStaton